Tag Archives: Dr. Ian Malcolm

The “Jurassic Park” Franchise – From Worst to Best

 Jurassic Park Series

     As someone who has always been interested and fascinated in dinosaurs, since I was a kid these are films that I’m grateful have been such high of quality as they as they are. At the core these are B Films with Dinosaurs in the place of monsters with our heroes put into survival situations where they must escape the bigger threat and in the process maybe learn some larger moral point.

      Steven Spielberg’s directing of the first 2 films and John Williams’s score cannot be overstated as well. These two are masters of their work and you can feel their influence (direct or otherwise) in all of these films.

      Besides dinosaurs this is a film where scientists are the heroes of the story. So often scientists are the villains of stories like this and there is nothing to define them outside of madness and maybe some misguided idealism. In this the scientists are the heroes who must rescue the future generations (the kids who are in these films to show us awe of dinosaurs and to be rescued) and to give warning to whatever idiot believes they can control nature/dinosaurs. This is the basic structure of these films, and honestly all of the work. So without further here are my thoughts on the films of the Franchise, starting from the worst and working my way up to the one I believe to be the best.

Jurassic World

4th – Jurassic World (2015)

      “Jurassic World” is a film that isn’t bad. The sad thing there are quite a few things I like about this film, such as the owner of the park and B.D. Wong’s scientist. Where it fell apart was the kids never struck me as afraid because they were dealing with CGI and not models and our heroes (Claire and Owen) were archetypes and never grew beyond that. The big fight at the end was way to fanservicey as well. I did come for the dinosaurs, but even I don’t believe that 3 competing hunters would team up against a larger threat, nature doesn’t tend to work that way and it struck me as only servicing the plot. As a side note, the raptors in this are wonderful though and what would have put this film higher on the list would have been more time with them and the dinosaurs. Humans were the weak link in this film.

Final Score: 7 / 10

https://cameronmoviesandtv.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/jurassic-world-2015-best-characters-wasted-and-not-enough-time-with-dinosaurs/

Jurassic Park 3

3rd – Jurassic Park III (2001)

      This is a film that is very aware it is a B Film so should be treated as such. It captures the essence of “The Lost World” and “Jurassic Park” well too as our characters are simply trying to survive and the raptors never stop being a threat. The mercenary leader feels like an actual character too, as does the couple with the failing marriage and even the survivor kid…which is more than I can say for “Jurassic World.” Also, Spinosaurus should not have been the main threat and the talking Raptor in Dr. Alan Grant’s dream was a really stupid idea and this film rightly gets criticism for that. If you are looking for an enjoyable B Dinosaur flick though, I’d give this film another chance.

Final Score: 7.6 / 10

https://cameronmoviesandtv.wordpress.com/2015/06/23/jurassic-park-iii-2001-a-fun-shlocky-b-movie-that-captures-the-spirit-of-jurassic-park/

rThe Lost World Jurassic Park

2nd – The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)

    Lightning struck twice for Spielberg as both the films he directed in this Franchise are favorites of mine. When I was a kid “The Lost World” was my favorite because the Raptors were taking out everyone and it was wonderful seeing the Dinosaurs stay actual threats throughout the entire film, and I liked the character of Dr. Ian Malcolm. In hindsight it isn’t as strong as the original though and here is why…the villain who is Hammond’s nephew is completely one-dimensional evil businessman and is just stupid and Kelly, Ian’s daughter never grows beyond berating her dad. She is static and that is a shame. She also had a stupid scene where she kicks a raptor doing gymnastics…so all these factors put it below the Original even though it is still a favorite film of mine.

Final Score: 9.2 / 10

https://cameronmoviesandtv.wordpress.com/2015/06/25/the-lost-world-jurassic-park-1997-humanitys-conflict-with-nature-and-finding-balance/

jurassic-park-movie-poster-1992-1020141477

1st – Jurassic Park (1993)

This film is a classic for a reason. You have a great cast of characters (Dr. Ellie, Ian and Alan), Hammond is our flawed dreamer who build the engine of his own destruction through the park and refusing to pay his employees well and this is this is the film that truly captured the awe and terror of the Raptors and the Tyrannosaurus Rex. This is a film that truly shows how cool it would be if there was a park where dinosaurs existed and has the best tension building of any of these films. We meet the characters, establish the world and slowly but surely watch as the dinosaurs kill off so many of the surrounding characters, forcing our heroes to truly choose what matters as they realize they are on the bottom of the food chain. This is a Kaiju/Monster film done right and still stands as the greatest film of the Franchise.

Final Score: 9.5 / 10

https://cameronmoviesandtv.wordpress.com/2015/07/01/jurassic-park-1993-the-power-and-wonder-of-nature-and-finding-what-matters/

Arguably this is a Franchise that works. I didn’t hate any of the films, and even the films that had things that didn’t work had other redeemable qualities to them (mostly in the form of the Dinosaurs) and that is why I think this Franchise is so well beloved. If you haven’t seen any of these films, I’d say give them a shot. I’d also love to hear your thoughts on the films as well and which ones you consider the best and the worst.

Advertisements

Jurassic Park (1993): The Power and Wonder of Nature and Finding What Matters

jurassic-park-movie-poster-1992-1020141477

       “Jurassic Park” deserves its place as a Classic. I think I was too harsh to it as a kid and enjoyed the fact that more people died in “The Lost World: Jurassic Park.” In this the stakes are much higher and because it is slower we get more time to know the characters, and unlike “Jurassic World” the characters feel real and everyone is active all the time, though kids of course are still the weakest part which is true of most Spielberg films. I think what helped this film was the author also writing the Screenplay, which sadly doesn’t happen all that much in Hollywood and arguably to the detriment of the scripts. Suffice to say, this film was great.

    “Jurassic Park” was directed by Steven Spielberg, written by Michael Crichton and David Koepp, produced by Kathleen Kennedy and Gerald R. Molen and based off the book of the same name by Michael Crichton.

     The story involves John Hammond (Richard Attenborough) bringing two experts being Dr. Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) and Dr. Grant (Sam Neill) to Jurassic Park in order so that they will write it off and he can get funding but things soon go wrong when an unhappy employee Dennis Nedry (Wayne Knight) sabotages the Park’s security and attempts to sell the Dinsosaur embryos to a rival the same time a giant storm hits, putting Hammond’s grandchildren and the people at risk.

The Pros: The Premise – The Premise is really cool. A billionare obsessed with dinosaurs uses science to create them and is willing to do anything to make his dream a reality. It coming crashing down on him is expected too, and it’s fun to watch the setup and execution.

The Soundtrack – John Williams at one of his best. The soundtrack captures wonder and terror so well and I understand why this score is used in most John Williams salutes by orchestras.

Character Moments – There are some really good character moments in this…from Ellie and Hammond talking about the wonder and fear of Hammond’s creation, the nihilism of Ian and the idealism of Alan and any interaction Alan has with the kids.

The Characters – The main and supporting characters are compelling and interesting and there are more of them in this film than the others in the Franchise. In the end this is what makes the film succeed besides the brilliant theme and message.

Dennis Nedry – Wayne Knight is wonderful as this troll IT Guy who harasses Hammond relentlessly and actually had a point that he isn’t being paid that much or helped out at all. Hammond can’t see beyond himself (and neither can Nedry) and in the end Nedry ends up dead because of it when he tries delivering the Embryos to a rival company.

Ray Arnold – Samuel L. Jackson plays the chain smoking scientist who is pretty pessimistic but does his best in a very bad situation. In the end he comes through though and he isn’t anti-Hammond the way Nedry is.

John Hammond – Richard Attenborough is fantastic as the wizened old man who began as a creator of a flea circus and became a multi-billionaire. His dreams have driven him in all that he does and are really more important than people until he realizes that his dream has killed people and his selfishness created his fall. He learns from his mistakes though and I really enjoyed his character, he was my favorite.

Dr. Ellie Satler – Laura Dern is wonderful in this role as the character who is quick to take action and is always looking out for others. She also has the sense of wonder and idealism of Grant until all that comes crashing down when the storm hits. She is the one who reminds Hammond of what matters and brings him out of himself.

Dr. Ian Malcolm – Ian is the Chaos Theory Mathematician and is a really fun character. He hits on everyone and has had a few marriages and kids, he fully lives a life of entropy and predicts the park falling apart. He still holds a sense of wonder though and he cares about the Grandchildren even going so far as risking his life and almost ending up killed by the T. Rex. He does end up injured.

Dr. Alan Grant – Sam Neill is great as the idealistic scientist who isn’t good with children who comes to show he can be a really good friend and mentor. He is the most courageous besides Ellie as he doesn’t think twice about taking action to protect others and he knows the Dinosaurs the best as he studied them as a paleontologist.

The Power of Nature – Nature’s power is front and center and the illusion of humanity’s control over it is shown when the storm makes it so the park is unsafe and Nedry turns on the Park and releases the cages. The dinosaurs reek havoc and are never really beaten in the end, they just beat one another.

The Tyrannosaurs Rex – The T. Rex is the main threat throughout the film, eating the lawyer and countless others, injuring the members who are visiting the park and in the end killing the Raptors. The T. Rex is the storm and it cannot be stopped, only avoided. None of the other films do that as well as this one.

The Raptors – Minus the introduction the Raptors are great. They are like the Aliens from “Alien” and “Aliens” and a force of nature that wherever they show up, someone will die. They also adapt to every situation and are only beat by a larger predator that surprises them.

Wonder in Science – The scientific wonder is fantastic! Even though the science doesn’t work that isn’t the point, the point is the celebration of the process of creation and wonder in discovering new things, which are important parts of science and being a scientist.

People Versus Dreams – Dreams are not more important than people and it is Hammond’s are to come to this realization as he wants the park to work up until he fears his Grandchildren dying. It is at that point he realizes people mattered all along.

Okay: The Kids – Kids are once again okay, didn’t believe the girl was a hacker or the boy had read Alan’s book, but that’s an issue I have with the kids in all these movies.

The Cons: The Introduction – The intro is so cheesy and bad. From the hunter’s mouth being really close to the Raptors having long enough arms to pull a heavy man into the cage…the only good part was the mist and trouble seeing things.

   “Jurassic Park” is truly a classic for a reason. It captures wonder, terror and respect for nature as well as giving us mostly complex characters and the characters who aren’t complex are a lot of fun. I’d recommend it for sure, this Spielberg and Crichton doing what they love with one of the best John Williams Soundtracks to date.

Final Score: 9.5 /10

The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) – Humanity’s Conflict With Nature and Finding Balance

The Lost World Jurassic Park

     “The Lost World: Jurassic Park” is a great sequel. It is a good thing Spielberg was in charge of it since he is a good director at creating complex characters and giving situations where actual stakes are involved, while still managing to give the film a heart. He is one of the greats for a reason and him directing the follow-up to the original was the right decision.

  The film was directed by Steven Spielberg, written by David Koepp, produced by Gerald R. Molen and Colin Wilson and based off The Lost World by Michael Crichton.

    The story involves Dr. Ian Malcolm (Jeff Goldblum) going to Site B, the Island of Isla Sorna to rescue his girlfriend Dr. Sarah Harding (Julianne Moore) who has gone there in order to record Dinosaurs in their natural state for a documentary so that humans won’t exploit them. They are too late and things get complicated when Hammond’s nephew Ludlow (Arliss Howard) arrives with a team to capture the Dinosaurs and take them to a park in San Diego as well as the arrival of Malcolm’s daughter Kelly (Vanessa Lee Chester), which complicates things further.

The Pros: The Cinematography – Janusz Kaminski did a wonderful job and as expected Spielberg has a good eye for how to cast a scene. The character scenes as well as the action scenes mean something and we get the chance to get to know the minor characters by how the action is presented.

The Soundtrack – John Williams is one of the greats for a reason and in this his soundtrack is great at creating tension and rising action. Each action scene felt big because of his soaring score.

The Action – This is one of the better action movies I have seen. There are so many moments that I remember and will remember. I’ll record the ones that stand out the most as they deserve recognition.

Hanging By a Rope – Van Owen and Harding rescue the trapped Tyrannosaurus baby and after they fix it’s leg the parents destroy the van, eventually this leads to it falling over the edge and it is only from the actions of Eddie Car releasing a rope through the van that they are able to get to rescue. Eddie dies in the process though.

The Raptor Hunt – At one point the hunters are running and the Raptors methodically take nearly every single one of them out. It is only the few that survive through luck and quick thinking showing just how dangerous they are.

The Tyrannosaurus Hunt – The T. Rex proceeds to cause chaos in the camp for the capture of it’s child. One of them is captured by Roland while the other slaughters the hunters the Raptors don’t get too.

the Tyrannosaurus in San Diego – This is quintessential Monster Movie here as we see a T. Rex escape from it’s cage and proceed to decimate San Diego. It is really well done and a lot of the destruction caused is simply from people afraid that it exists. It was very well cast and showed once again just how dangerous this creature is. I liked it.

The Characters – There are quite a few great characters in this! From Dr. Harding and Dr. Malcolm and the hunter Roland as well as the Earth First activist. Each of them are more complicated than any archetype, which leads to some great interaction and character growth over the course of the film.

Eddie Carr – This minor character dies to the T. Rex’s but not before he saves his friends. He idealizes Dr. Harding but we see he is good at his job too as it is his creativity that saves our heroes in the first place. Richard Schiff did a great job and his death meant something.

John Hammond – Hammond has changed from the industrialist to the conservationist and it is a really good arc the events at “Jurassic Park” changed him. He is wonderful as the wise wizard who has learned from his mistakes while still being wily and reckless.

Nick Van Owen – I don’t like Vince Vaughn, he tends to be a dick in real life and his characters he plays. This character wasn’t as bad and him being a dick worked as he was an extreme activist who put others at risk to rescue animals. He is never presented as the good guy but you get why he is doing it too, especially since these dinosaurs are endangered by their very existence and he wants to safeguard that.

Roland Tembo – Peter Postlewaite does an awesome job in this role! He is the hunter who lives for the thrill of it and has respect for the animals he hunts as he sees himself as fulfilling his greater purpose. When his friend is killed on the Island though he decides he is done after he captures the T. Rex and has had enough of death. I don’t think he’ll stop hunting but he won’t work with people like Ludlow anymore…folks who don’t value human life.

Dr. Sarah Harding – Julianne Moore plays the naive idealist who learns to not be reckless around dinosaurs while still fulfilling her mission of saving the ones on the Island. She saves Malcolm a few times which makes up for times he had to save her in the beginning. She is a strong character who does what she wants.

Dr. Ian Malcolm – Ian is the nervous scientist played by Jeff Goldblume who carries on the lessons of “Jurassic Park” about keeping dinosaurs away from human beings. He is the Spock to Sarah’s Kirk and his arc is learning how to feel for others better as we see him have to put himself out there to protect Sarah his girlfriend and to protect his daughter and support her beyond words. It is a great arc and it is him coming into his own as a person who can look beyond himself.

Respect for the Natural World – The message is through Hammond’s action. He was a man who wanted people to feel wonder and live the vision he created, on his death bed though he only wants the creatures he created to be respected as he realized he didn’t before by keeping them in cages. It is to this end that he sent them on a mission to protect his creations. It is a good arc since the Dinosaurs aren’t idealized, they are animals like anything else and deserve the chance to flourish. This basis of respect while still not forgetting humans creativity in development is part of what makes this film so great.

A T.Rex is still a T.Rex (even if you save it’s baby) – I really like that part of respect is respecting the space of hunters, be it humanity or the T. Rex. The heroes save the baby T. Rex but there van is destroyed by the T. Rexes. The nature of a T. Rex does not change and the saving of their baby doesn’t change the fact that T. Rexs eat smaller animals which include humans. I’m glad that in the conversation talk it was still smart. A tiger will still try and kill you, even if you return it’s cub back.

Okay: Peter Ludlow – Hammond’s nephew is all about making InGen profitable again but he does nearly have a change of heart when the T. Rex is reeking havoc, he only changes his mind when he realizes that the T. Rex baby could be his only out from facing major consequences for his stupidity. He was alright as an antagonist.

Kelly – Child actors have a difficult time and Vanessa Chester does alright as Kelly. She is a daughter ignored by both her parents so she acts out for attention while still trying to be successful to impress her folks. Her arc is finding confidence and building a relationship with her dad. I did think it was stupid she kicked a raptor using gymnastics, but besides that she wasn’t a bad character, just not a great character.

I remembered liking this more than “Jurassic Park” as the Dinosaurs felt like actual animals and T. Rex’s won’t save the day against Raptors since they want to eat you too…this is part of the reason I’m curious if it will still be the case when I get to “Jurassic Park.” Which will be better to me, the original or the sequel “The Lost World?” Well, well see when I get there.  Suffice to say I enjoyed this film greatly and would watch it again. It is definitely a favorite.

Final Score: 9.2 / 10. Solidly great film.