Avengers: Endgame (2019) – A Good but Deeply Flawed Film

New Avengers: Endgame Poster Reveals the New Team | Collider

        “Avengers: Endgame” is a good but really flawed movie. This is a film that had so many working parts, part of me is surprised it even worked at all. While another part of me really wishes it had focused on cleaning up the plot holes and story issues. Would I recommend this film? If you’ve come this far it is a nice way to finish on “The Avengers” story, even if it doesn’t all work. That is really the best review I can give you on it. It is at times really good but the holes it creates within it’s own lore are problems I think will be discussed long after Disney Plus and other “MCU” related content has sought to answer them.

The film was directed by Anthony and Joe Russo and written by Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeeley.

The story follows our heroes as they seek to live with what happened after Thanos’s snap at the end of “Infinity War.” They are left trying to deal until Ant-Man arrives, offering them a potential solution for bringing back all those they lost in the snap.

SPOILERS ahead

The Pros:

The Five Year Jump – I love that our heroes can’t just fix what happened easily. Right after the film we have the wait until Captain Marvel arrives, and than the survivors all go to Thanos in the Garden and kill him, but they can’t change what he did as he used the Infinity Stones to destroy the Infinity Stones. After that our heroes change, Thor goes into a dark depression, Black Widow becomes leader of the Avengers, Iron Man starts a family with Pepper Pots and they have a daughter, Bruce Banner become Professor Hulk, Captain America takes care of the survivors in their grief and Hawkeye becomes a vigilante named Rhonin. The others take care of their countries or are investigating strange occurrences around the universe. This time jump was smart in that showed that the events of “Infinity War” forever changed our characters, and for them there is no going back.

The Personal Moments – There are a lot of personal moments that stand out in “Endgame.” The moments largely come out of the time travel that is done when the Avengers are collecting the Infinity Stones scattered throughout time. We have Black Widow recruit Hawkeye in the lead-up and see how deep their friendship is, Tony talks to his dad Howard about being a Dad, Thor talks to his Mom who was killed in “Thor: The Dark Word,” and Thor and Rocket have a touching moment talking about loss and tragedy. These were the personal moments I loved in the film.

Scott Lang / Ant-Man – Ant-Man is the funniest part of the film and is also the emotional heart too as he is the one who realizes time travel might be the way for them to get the Infinity Stones and bring back those lost in the snap. He has some great jokes and his coming out of the Quantam Realm is powerful too as the world population has been halved so there has been a social breakdown since he’s been gone. When he discovers his daughter survived, it is one of the happiest moments in the film. You get why he’s willing to risk everything to bring back all those who were lost.

Bruce Banner / Hulk – Hulk after the five year jump is a character who has finally found balance and is easily the wisest out of all the Avengers. I wanted to know more about his life before the five year jump but the time we get with him helping with the plan is awesome. He has a sense of humor and because he has the Hulk body he needs help picking up smaller things. One of his big acts is to bring back those who were lost in the Snap, as he knows he is one of the few who can wield the Gauntlet without dying. I also like that this balanced Hulk came about because Hulk  and Bruce both lost to Thanos in “Infinity War.” Neither one could defeat him alone but together they were able to save everyone.

Thor – Thor is a broken character in this film. He’s lost his parents, his brother, his best friend and half his people to Thanos so after the five year jump he is a loner, gamer and drunk in New Asgard letting Valkyrie lead while he tries to escape from his failure. What helps him heal are his conversations with Rocket and when they visit the Asgard of the past to get the Aether (which is one of the “Infinity Stones” out of Jane Foster. Talking to his mother in past helps him deal with her lost that he’d experienced and Rocket helps him focus so that he later ready to fight Thanos once more. What all of this help him realize is that he isn’t fit to rule and has never done that. He’s always been the adventurer to joins the returned “Guardians of the Galaxy.”

Nebula – This is going to get a little confusing as there are 2 Nebulas in this film. The one I’m referring to is the one who was around after the five year jump and isn’t the one still serving Thanos that future Nebula kills (and isn’t canceled out somehow) in the film. This Nebula changes past Gamora and causes past Gamora to turn against Thanos in the final battle. Karen Gilllian truly owns this role and I can’t wait to see what they do with her in the future.

Tony Stark / Iron Man – This is really Tony’s story as after the five year jump he has a family and is raising a daughter with Pepper Pots and it is for them that he comes back to try and bring back all those lost during the snap. From here his arc is making peace with his eventual death as he does everything right, makes peace with Captain America and moves forward having all of them make a promise that they won’t erase what was built in the last five years. He’s the most responsible person in this entire story in regards to Time Travel, and he never loses sight of getting all the Infinity Stones to stop Thanos. His death is powerful too as he uses his snap to turn Thanos and his forces to dust as what was done to his friends before. This causes his death which is how the film is ended.

The Cons:

The Premise – Time travel plots are tough to do right and this one in refusing to lay down rules ends up leaving some very big plot holes with what it tries to do to bring everyone back and to have a character live out his life in the past. I really would have preferred a fight for the Infinity Stones against Thanos and that be the core plan but that is left early when Thanos gets killed off shortly after the snap but they learn he destroyed the Stones leaving Time Travel as really the only option. This was the first way they wrote themselves into a hole, and for me the problems are big enough that they gave me a lot of dislike for this film.

Lack of Thanos Kills -They find a way to bring back Thanos as with time travel past Thanos somehow learns about their plans from hacking future Nebula’s tech. This leads to him somehow pulling his forces to the present the Avengers are in. Well he shows up and he destroys the Avengers Compound. He reveals his full army and forces and says he’ll destroy Earth…and doesn’t kill a single person. For how dangerous he was in “Infinity War,” in this film he is just weak. I hated this. Tt took away from the sacrifices because based on how it was filmed it looked like the Avengers and their Allies would destroy him and his army anyway without anyone dying.

Time Travel Plot Holes – The best thing I can do here is just list them. The excuse I keep hearing is “Alternate Timelines” but what does that mean in regards to the state of the Universe and the fact that the Ancient One tells Hulk that removing the Infinity Stones from their proper place in time will lead to a worse timeline. Time for the plot holes.: Loki escapes with the Tesseract in the timeline of “The Avengers” movie now, Past Thanos was killed but that didn’t erase Future Thanos, Past Gamora is in the future which maybe erases Prime Gamora in the Soul Stone? or a different Soul Stone? Captain America delivers all the Infinity Stones back to where they belonged but stuck around to grow old as Agent Carter’s husband meaning at one point maybe 3 Captain Americas existed at once. As well as others. It is a mess and no emotional core can change how much this bothered me.

Captain America’s Ending – I’m coming back to this because this was the thing that annoyed me the most. At one point it looks as if they’ve set up Captain America’s death as the first death of Past Thanos. This would have been perfect as with the survivors returning his death could inspire everyone and no one else, or just Iron Man dying is more forgivable narratively. Instead he lives as an old man knowing that 2 Captain America’s were running around at one point and than proceeded to let Hydra rise again and countless other evils that happened over the course of the series that he couldn’t do because he was frozen in the ice. I hated this so much. In the end the writer’s gave us Captain America fanservice versus what the man we saw in the Marvel Cinematic Universe would do. This was a character who had duty and the protection of others above all else, and he got rid of it all to be selfish. The only thing I liked was Falcon becoming the new Captain America.

This is a film that I’d recommend to those who have come this far and want to see where the main Avengers end up. There are so many stories to tell in this Universe and I’m curious to see where they lead, though with the writing plot holes I also worry that we’ll see a decrease in quality come with it. An emotional core can only get a film so far. Your plot devices need to work properly and your characters have to make sense. In the end Captain America didn’t work for me and the Time Travel plot kept it from being great. I would have rather had the five year jump and them fight Thanos in the present and force Prime Thanos to rethink his original agenda after they get a hold of an Infinity Stone so Thanos can’t just snap again to fix things. Prime Thanos was compelling and Past Thanos is just nothing. He has a lot of faceless minions and ends up being more of an Ultron, which he wasn’t in “Infinity War.” So, check this film out if you have come this far. I really worry what will come out of the MCU after this. I worry this film may have created more problems than it solved.

Final Score: 8 / 10 Initially it was a higher score but the problems have bothered me more than the things I like, the longer I’ve thought about the film. It is solidly good, but the flaws keep it from greatness.

Advertisements

Top 5 Characters in “Gotham”

Image result for Gotham Final Season poster

       With “Gotham” now at an end, I was thinking at how I best wanted to explore my thoughts on the series. First, I think it is a solid show well worth your time if you are a Batman fan, though it’s flaws kept it from being great. One thing that kept it good, even with the flaws was how memorable so many of the characters were. I’m a huge fan of Batman and his rogues gallery and this series brought some amazing interpretations of his allies and rogues to the screen. “Gotham” is a show that tells the story of Commissioner Gordon and Bruce Wayne before Bruce Wayne becomes Batman. It is here we see one version of how his enemies came to be and what motivates Gordon and defines the city of Gotham. The series was created by Bruno Heller, and the fact that this list exists shows that at the end of the day, I did like this show.

The show wasn’t always the best, there were a few times I took a break during it’s run and to me the final was serviceable but nothing I’d praise. It just established what the show had been leading up to the entire time and didn’t do it in a unique way. I’m avoiding details for those who haven’t watched the finale yet. I want to avoid Final Season spoilers as this show makes it easy to talk about the broad strokes of what worked or didn’t.

For the weak characters, I wasn’t the biggest fan of Bruce and Selina for a long time. They eventually became okay. Ra’s al Ghul was wasted and given he is played by one of my favorite actors (Alexander Siddig) I held that against the show. The Al Ghul’s in general were wasted as was the League of Shadows. They were supposed to be this apocalyptic force but they never did much to the heroes of the story in big picture scheme of the show. For the few who did do something they almost always end up dead or useless by the end of their arcs. The gangsters like Carmine and Sofia Falcone stayed compelling during their runs but they also didn’t have the unique feel of the characters I’m going to give an honorary mentions too. Same goes for Theo / Azrael and his sister Tabitha / Tigress. They were interesting but weren’t fascinating enough for an honorary mention.

For my honorary mentions. Those go to Barbara and Jim Gordon, Harvey Bullock and Lee Thompkins to start. These were are complicated characters who often times fell on the side of the good. Also honorary mentions to Scarecrow and the Mad Hatter for being fascinating villains whose twisted mentality added to the show. None of these folks made the list but were a joy to watch and what kept the show interesting when my favorite characters weren’t getting exciting moments. Fish Mooney was also great and I enjoyed what they did with her over her run on the show. Zsasz also deserves a mention too. Whether he was working for a crime boss or on his own, he always had fun and was threatening in any situation they put him in.

How without further ado, here are my Top 5 Characters on “Gotham.”:

 

Image result for Gotham Alfred

5th Place – Alfred Pennyworth

Alfred is a character I wish we had gotten more time to know. I’m not the only one apparently since he is getting his own show in Fox called “Pennyworth.” This goes to show just how powerful Sean Pertwee’s performance was. Pertwee gave a hardness and empathy that I have rarely seen in how Alfred is written or potrayed on film. This was a man who was taking care of Bruce and fighting rogues throughout the entire season. Sometimes it would break him physically or emotionally, but he always came back. He had the compassion that Jim sometimes lost and he’d been through so much more with his time in the Special Forces of Great Britain. He also wasn’t a doormat for Bruce, when Bruce was a selfish teenager, he left. He left Bruce sort out himself but was always there to help, when Bruce was ready. The little scenes we get related to that past crystallize this Alfred as a wonderfully compelling badass. This Alfred understood the choice when Bruce was going vigilante, and even though he questioned he still supported him in the end. Some of the best scenes in this entire show came from Pertwee and I’m curious what “Pennyworth” is going to bring to the Lore of this show and the compelling character of Alfred Pennyworth.

 

Related image

4th Place – Jerome and Jeremiah Valeska / The Jokers

“Gotham” took an approach to “The Joker” I haven’t seen before. For the character two brothers played by the same actor inhabited the role. We got Jerome Valeska’s origin in Season 1 with Jim Gordon and he was one of the main antagonists until he made his brother Jerome crazy later. Each them inhabits parts of the Joker lore. Jerome is more “New 52” (who had his face taken off and sewed back on) and is insanity who acted more on instinct and big events while his brother Jeremiah was more of the thinker. His brother Jeremiah thought big and is the one who we end up following until the end. This Joke has a a friendship with Bruce before Jerome drives him crazy and this gives depth to the craziness that comes later. As you can see I could not choose between the two and as they are both played by Cameron Monaghan. I feel that they deserve the tie. Each brings a different part of the lore to this character that is so essential to Batman’s lore. I also thought that the writer’s could have gone deeper, which is why neither of them are further up on the list. Cameron’s acting is great but at times they didn’t know what to do with this character and he rarely had season running arcs.

 

Image result for Gotham Riddler

3rd Place – Edward Nygma / The Riddler

Edward Nygma was a character I hated initially. He was all the aspects of the toxic creep and was presented as potentially redeemable for the longest time. It took him going full “Riddler” that really changed my perspective on him. It was in his role as the manipulator who wanted to make a name from it that made him compelling. “The Riddler” and Nygma contrast and them agreeing on being bad and devoting themselves to it is what made him a great villain. He had to go through Arkham to get there but when he came out it was his relationship with Penguin that added complexity, especially as his old toxic evil habits came back again. Cory Michael Smith brought so much nuance to this role and dual personalities that exist between Nygma and “The Riddler.” Even given this dichotomy though, he is always the villain and never does anything that doesn’t logically serve his own ends, but he will put his neck out for others and take risks for that core goal. We see this with Lee Thompkins and even Penguin a few brief times. His frenemy relationship with Penguin was one of my favorite things and whenever they found a working relationship, things were gold as “The Riddler” was the strategist while Penguin was willing to ruthlessly fight and kill for anything he desired. They were a dangerous duo and it was out of that relationship that “The Riddler” became one of my favorite characters.

 

Image result for Gotham Doctor Strange

2nd Place – Doctor Hugo Strange

B.D. Wong’s version of Doctor Hugo Strange is the best version of this character I have seen thus far. The first time I appreciated Hugo Strange as a character was Gotham City as he was a manipulator pulling on the strings and winning through most of the story. He manages to trap Bruce Wayne in Arkham City in the game, which is a huge feat in and of itself. It was making him a minion in that story, which was the problem. Here is is often times serving people, but he always has a larger agenda at play or at least some level of survival to be himself beyond another’s aims. Throughout the entire series Strange was always one step ahead of foes and I can’t think of a time where he truly lost. Whomever was around would never kill him because he was far to useful and he’d use that to eventually outdo them or escape. This is the character who out of the 5 here has the least connection to Bruce Wayne, which makes me curious about what his relationship will be later to Batman, later in the lore post “Gotham.” “Regardless, “Gotham” is worth watching if only for the Doctor Hugo Strange episodes and B.D. Wong’s masterful performance. He brings in the insane mad scientist who has a familial bond with his creations and resurrections, as well as a ruthlessness of someone who in the end is doing everything to some greater unknown end.

 

Image result for Gotham penguin

1st Place – Oswald Cobblepot / The Penguin

Robin Lord Taylor truly created the best version of “The Penguin” I have seen in any of the DC Lore. This is a Penguin who has been Mayor, been through Arkham, Blackgate and risen and fallen multiple times. Even with the rise and fall of this character, with those rises and falls over seasons came to define the best of “Gotham” for me. In this show we get to learn about Penguin’s father born of money who he ended up re-establishing a relationship with, only for his step-family to kill his father and further drive him to madness. This combined with betrayals throughout his many rises lead to Penguin becoming paranoid. This paranoia became one his defining traits along with his selfish petulant nature. How did this end up being appealing? Because those aspects of the character are always there but oftentimes he would choose courage or take a risk with an enemy and make them an ally. He does this with Ed after Ed tries to kill him and easily found compromises with the Mob and gangs when he wasn’t taking them over. For how obvious Cobblepot’s flaws are he knew how to use them. This is why he is my favorite character. Along with him being smart enough to know his foes, Robin Lord Taylor granted this character limited moments of empathy and sorrow that gave depth to the character that I have not seen in any show or movie for Penguin, nor read in any comic. This is why he is 1st Place on my Top 5 Character of “Gotham.”

For any fan of DC Comics this is a show worth checking out. I’d put it far above “Batman Forever” and “Batman and Robin.” There are better properties like Burton and Nolan, but this is an example of good adaptation. This series is better than “The New 52” animated Batman films that I reviewed years ago aren’t nearly as good at making their heroes as compelling or deep and their rogues are forgettable. This series is in no way perfect. Characters are brought back to life, plot lines are abandoned and sometimes there are arcs that only exist for the sake of love triangle dramas. Some of these choices worked and some didn’t, but at the end of the day I stuck around for the characters. These are the five characters who made the show worth watching in the end, and the reason I’d recommend this show to any Batman fan.

Glass (2019): A Film That Almost Worked

Glass Poster Ahead Of Comic-Con | Cosmic Book News

      “Unbreakable” was the film that put Shyamalan on the map for me. I was not a fan of “Split.” I thought it was a passable horror film that of preyed off people who did suffer from multi-personality and making them villains (which is sadly a common trope of horror of making “The Other” the enemy). It is part of the “Unbreakable Trilogy” and as far as non-spoiler thoughts, “Glass” is the weakest part of the Trilogy. I’d choose flawed “Split” for at least knowing what it was. This film doesn’t know what it wants to be. At times it wasn’t to be a psychological thriller, other times it wants to be a super hero film. Because it can’t settle I feel like it muddles whatever message it was trying to say, which is a big reason this film will never be more than passable entertainment.

The film was written and directed by M. Night Shyamalan who was also one of the producers.

The story picks up after “Split” with Kevin / “The Horde” (James McAvoy) capturing a few cheerleaders as as David Dunn “The Overseer” (Bruce Willis) seeks out his location in order to rescue them. In the end they are captured and put in an asylum under Dr. Staple (Sarah Paulson). Here they find Elijah / Mr. Glass (Samuel L. Jackson) is also a member of the asylum and must face the reality of what they are while people connected to them seek answers.

SPOILERS ahead

The Pros:

Cinematography – This is a beautiful looking movie. Even though it is Blumhouse Studios the use of colors here to represent the different characters look amazing. Mr. Glass with dark purples, Kevin with yellow clothing and the ever present green whenever David Dunn is the “Overseer” or thinking of embracing the roles. This is handled best in Mr. Glass’s plan to free them all and reveal heroes to the world as the color contrasts bring scenes to life during the escape.

What is Real? – The basic premise is pretty good and I wish it had focused on this and not given us an answer. In the asylum we are given plenty of examples of how our main characters aren’t supernatural in any way. Being very strong does not make one Superman and being very smart does not make one Lex Luthor. As Dr. Staple breaks down the barriers of defense our characters have put on their beliefs it gives us some really good slow tension. I wish this had been the film as the ending could still happen without the ending we got, which says “Superheroes are real.” In this way it could have stuck to landing as a more psychological piece.

The Main Characters – The main 3 who the story is built around are the best parts of the film. Seeing Mr. Glass manipulating everything, David Dunn being conflicted over his identity and the many personalities in Kevin / The Horde. They are what keep this movie from sucking and I wish we’d gotten more time with them and didn’t have the minor characters at all.

David Dunn / The Overseer – Bruce Willis is back and we finally get to see some development on who he’s become post “Unbreakable.” In this he has embraced his role as vigilante and is the reason that Kevin and him get captured as it his action that leads to the rescue of the captured cheerleaders but also the arrival of the Police who capture the two of them. He spends the most time questioning his role and nearly decides not to take action at the end because he believes he isn’t a hero. In the end he comes through to begin rescuing people from The Horde, only to be taken down by Dr. Staple’s organization with the other 2.

Kevin / The Horde – The Horde are a wonderfully creepy villain and Kevin being the child who lead to them coming about when he reacted to abuse from his Mother is fascinating. This is explored more in the story as we see the Horde exists to protect the core personality and within the different personalities there isn’t always consensus, which makes the Dr. Staple conversations fascinating. In my opinion he never stops being a villain even though Shyamalan tries his best to give an undeserved redemption story via one of his victims helping Kevin come out (only for Kevin to be killed shortly after in the final fight).

Elijah Price / Mr. Glass – Mr. Glass is only in the movie interacting with people for a short amount of time, and the movie could have used so much more of him. He’s the most interesting out of all of our characters and seeing his mind in action is easily the best part of the film. I wanted more of that. We get a flashback of when his bones break when he was younger, but we don’t get scenes of him as the super villain or him realizing that that is what he wants to become. Him questioning being a “Super” would have been the most profound as well, as he as the strongest believer in the concept dating all the way back to “Unbreakable.”

The Cons:

The Minor Characters – Casey, the surviving victim of the Horde is now drawn to him and feels connected to him because she was abused by her Uncle. Mr. Glass’s Mom is around but seems to be just there to witness things and David Dunn’s son believes his dad is a super hero. The characters when they have anything interesting are awful in how they seem to glorify abuse via Casey and Kevin’s connection (The movie never admits and calls out that Kevin is a serial killer who eats people) and David Dunn’s son has no personality. In the end they reveal the videos of heroes existing, which just struck me as stupid. We follow these characters but none of them work for different reasons. I would have preferred they not be in it all and us left with just with “The Supers.”

Glorifying Abuse – This ties into Kevin being a serial killer never being called out. Again, Casey cares about the serial killer who killed her friends because Kevin was abused to be that way and we learn recently that she’d been abused by her Uncle. This ends up feeling like a tactic glorifying of abuse as in the end Kevin finds human connection with Casey and she ignores all the people he has killed. I’m not sure what point Shyamalan was trying to make with their relationship but it really hurt the story.

The Final Reveals – There are multiple reveals, none of which I felt work. One is that the asylum is a place suppressing that super heroes exist and the other reveal is that the train that killed David Dunn’s wife also killed Kevin’s dad. I hated that reveal so much, it was bad storytelling and there was zero reason for it happen beyond giving The Horde a reason to turn against Mr. Glass, when that didn’t matter because they were all going to be killed by Dr. Staple’s organization anyway. In the end the reveals canceled out any point the story might have had.

For all of the cons that I mentioned, this film could have still worked if it had known what it wanted to be. We spend so much time in the asylum that I wanted that to be the truth. The truth is that they weren’t “Supers” and there isn’t a conspiracy. That could have been a good psychological thriller. Or, don’t have the asylum at all, just give us the heroes facing off against one another as the ending was really strong and worked as that type of film. Be a psychological thriller that makes you question reality or be a super hero film with elements of reality more akin to “The Dark Knight” or “Super.” It is in this that the opening and the escape are the strongest parts of the film, but the lack of focus and the very obvious cons kept it from being good.

Final Score: 6 / 10. Lower than the other 2 in the Trilogy because at least those films knew what they were trying to be.

One-Punch Man – Season 1 Retrospect – A Satire and Celebration of Superheroes

one-punch-man

     “One-Punch Man” is an anime that has been recommended to me by quite a few friends. It was as good as they said. This is a series that satires superheroes as well as celebrating them and gives us some wonderfully well rounded characters, of which I’ll get into more detail about in the review.

   The series was created by a manga author who goes under the pseudonym “One,” Madhouse is the one who produces the anime that I watched.

    The story involves the superhero Saitama who can defeat any enemy in one punch but is never recognized by anyone for what he does. This leads to him joining the Hero Association in order to join recognition after he saves Genos, a cyborg who then becomes his disciple.

The Pros: The World – The world is awesome! You have Superheroes, aliens, monsters and villains and all of them are colorful in personality. Sadly many of them die before there is the chance to know them better since the nature of the show is that Saitama is overpowered.

The Comedy – The comedy and satire are fantastic! Heroes that are larger than life are critiqued in their egos and even overall culture is critiqued in how Saitama saves the world but is never given credit or noticed because his personality leads people to believe it wasn’t him who did it. Genos’s over sincerity and devotion is funny at times too as Saitama really just wanted to be left alone.

The Action – The fights are great, even if the ones with “One-Punch Man” are very short. The introductions and lead up tend to be amazing.

Saitama – Saitama is fun, his Pilot episode starts out with him dreaming of past victories and becoming bored because no one can beat him. In the end he finds that he does it because he loves it though and when Genos introduces him to the world of Heroes that become noticed and famous he joins them too as his desire for more is contrasted with his non-assuming nature.

Genos – Genos is great in that the only way to kill him would be destroy his head and even though he is all robotic he still wants to be the best. He is a character who is driven by his loss of his body and his devotion to Saitama, which is contrasted with his desire to be Saitama’s better and to be accepted, just like what Saitama wants. They really make a great duo.

The Hero Association – The Hero Association is fantastic! You have the lower level S heroes who are ones from a guy riding a bike to how people perceive One-Punch Man. The big heroes are fascinating too as they are celebrities and that has only fed many of their egos making them larger than life.

The Cons: Lack of Great Main Villain – This is a major issue, Saitama is “One-Punch Man” so there is no one who can defeat him. His only challenges really involve his ego or Genos’s struggles and those are great, but why continue the show if that’s all there is to it? A great villain or foil can drive the plot and create great conflict.

   This is a great show that only promise with where it can go. It satirezes heroes wonderfully in how comical they are and in their attitude and costume and also treats them with respect too, This is a world that feels lived in and has consequences for our characters…consequences that in many have yet to be fully explored such as Genos and the influence of the higher ups in the Association.

Final Score: 9.5 / 10 Solidly great anime that just needed a better ovearching baddie…a Lex Luthor to Saitama’s Superman.

“The Venture Bros.” Season 1 – Great Characters, Villains and World…I Want to See More

The Venture Bros Episode 2

     I am so glad one of my friends recommended this show. A season done and I can’t wait to see what happens next. This is a show that celebrates and satires Super Hero stories as well as old adventure stories and old adventure television mysteries (think “Scooby-Doo”) suffice to say it has quickly become a favorite show. The greatest part of this show is really the  characters who define the mythos, which I will get into deeper in the review.

    The series was created back Jackson Publick who also wrote a lot of the episodes with Doc Hammer.

     The story involves the misadventures of the Venture Family as they get into a lot of trouble and face their enemies ranging from Baron Underbheit to the Monarch, though their greatest enemy is often themselves.

The Pros: The World – The world of “The Venture Bros.” is awesome! It is a world full of heroes, villains, secret agencies, androids and mysteries. There are super heroes and super villains and each has tons of henchmen to boot. Seriously, it is an awesome world.

The Soundtrack – The soundtrack captures the pulpy nature of the show really well. It’s fast and snappy and reminds me of the old Adam West “Batman” and comics from that era….which captures the characters perfectly. J.G. Thirwell is awesome.

The Animation – The animation is awesome. It flows and has a pulpy feel to it that shows us each character and how they tick, from the Venture Bros. running at the beginning to the tall standing Brock to the slouched Dr. Venture. Character mannerisms are captured beautifully in the animation.

The Characters – The characters are the strongest part, with the minor one-shot characters being the only time the show really feels weak. The main characters though get some great exploration though.

Jonas Venture Jr. – Jonas Venture Jr. is Dr. Venture’s brother who breaks out of his body (he was eaten in the womb) and wants revenge until Dr. Venture apologizes and gives him half of all he has, showing he is more than just someone out for revenge and is smart and capable of growth.

Hank Venture – Hank is the jock of the Venture Bros. and idealizes Brock even though he is a complete dweeb. He’s usually always fighting his brother Dean. He is obsessed with blaming whatever happens on ghosts and is a lot like Fred from “Scooby-Doo.”

Dean Venture – Dean is the anxious nerd of the brothers who is the first to fall in love (Triana) and is the more sensitive of the two. He is the brother I like more as he has a lot more awareness of his surroundings, though he is just as much a danger to himself as Hank.

Dr. Venture – Dr. Venture is the cynical protagonist who only seems to really care about Brock. We never see him care about his sons except how he can use them to save himself and is a washed up has-been as he even sells a lot of his and his father’s stuff in an episode. He is a character who is apathetic and just doesn’t care. He does have a tender side though, as we see when he is in a relationship with Dr. Girlfriend.

Brock Samson – Brock is my favorite character on the show. The guy is unstable and a walking tank as it takes a lot to bring him down. We see that his one true love is Molotov Cocktease and that he is really doing his own thing most of the time when he isn’t protecting Dr. Venture and the brothers. He also has a good heart too as he helps an ex-military guy and his Bigfoot husband escape.

Old Team Venture – Old Team Venture is pretty great. Gentlman is probably my favorite of them and I can’t wait to see more of how the original Venture interacted with them.

The Villains – The main villains are awesome and each have distinct personalities and motivations, and they go way back, all the way to college in regards to their relationship to Dr. Venture.

Baron Underbheit – Baron Underbheit was a foreign exchange student who was Dr. Venture’s friend. Sadly the friendship when sour after he got his jaw blown off so now he hates him. They still can interact without killing each other though as he goes to Dr. Venture’s yard sale and the funeral of their mutual friend.

Dr. Girlfriend – Dr. Girlfriend is awesome! She was a powerhouse who hooked up with the Monarch and has been the only one holding his operation together. We see her good side countless times though, from her relationship to Dr. Venture to her sadness at the Monarch for when he turns on her. I’m glad she’s sticking around as she is easily the most competent character on the show besides Brock.

the Monarch – the Monarch is an awesome villain! This is a guy who lives by his obsession against Dr. Venture but has everything going against him as he has the maturity of a child and it is that that pushes Dr. Girlfriend away into the Guild of Calamity’s and Phantom Limb’s arms. This is what ends him up in prison with no allies and only his obsession against the Ventures to sustain him. Though he is given depth even then as he likes Hank and Dean and helps them get out of prison (though sadly his minions kill them anyway).

The Satire – The satire is brilliant in this! From the villains and heroes all knowing each other in college, the parent and obsessive issues they all have as well as the Villains have to live by rules laid down by the Guild. Superheroes are satired, mad scientists, villains, pulp and comic stories, etc. Each episode is really worth a second watch and I look forward to Season 2.

   This is a solidly amazing show that knows exactly what it wants to be (a satire and celebration of the pulp genre and the many forms it takes) and an exploration of characters, while always never forgetting the comedy that defines it. If I were to think of any con it would be that some threads get dropped (the Guild and their place in this world, Hank and Dean need more development, etc.). The older characters are fantastic though and even Hank and Dean have their comedic moments leaving only the one shot characters who are joke as the only major con. Regardless, this is an amazing show that I highly recommend.

Final Score: 9.5 / 10